– a third party may also be a party to a union contract; In addition, the company regulated by the company can also be one. – Depending on the effect of the shareholders` pact, one can distinguish, on the one hand, a shareholder contract concluded before the formation of the company, which is the type of pre-contracted, and, on the other hand, an effective shareholder pact in parallel with the effectiveness of the statutes, which may even survive the statutes governing the operation and termination of the company. Shareholder agreements can be categorized according to different criteria. There are different forms of voting systems. According to the present case, a union with the right to vote may, on the one hand, be a long-term union that requires continuous cooperation (but long-term or even undefined in time) and, on the other hand, it may be an ad hoc union that defines an obligation to cooperate for a given general assembly (members` assembly) and which, therefore, , extends its temporal effect exclusively to the general assembly defined there. On the basis of its objective, a union may, on the one hand, be a consortium of general voices, in which members commit to vote uniformly on all matters within the competence of the general assembly; On the other hand, it may be a special voting system that requires only the obligation to vote, in accordance with the Union`s decision, on certain predefined issues, such as the vote on dividends or the election of senior executives or other entities. With regard to its purpose or the rigour of its definition, a union may, on the one hand, be closed if even the choice is defined by the treaty (for example. (b) the choice of the person appointed by the head of the union for a specific position in the company) or may also exist permanent unions for which only the single voting obligation is required and the nature of the vote (vote against or for a proposal) is not determined until later. Because of its content, a union may be a union that requires a uniform voting obligation or a majority decision as a change in the statutes of the parties to the union agreement. The characterization of the majority or the establishment of unanimity in cases where no such act is imposed by law or statutes “may be justified especially when some members fear being exposed to the whims of others, if they are alone in a minority position”.
 Legal literature also provides practical advice: “There is no sense to exaggerate in this regard.