“Therefore, the section is considering referring the parties to an arbitration procedure regarding the compliance/existence of the following conditions: it was also recalled that this is also a strong law, that arbitration is an important alternative dispute resolution procedure to be promoted due to the wide scope of cases before the courts and court costs. Any requirement, for safety reasons, would certainly result in constipation of this process. In addition, it is easy to visualize that a 10% deposit of a huge debt would often be even higher than the legal fees that can be collected for filing an appeal in a civil court. In Yegiazaryan v Smagin  EWCA Civ 1290, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal against Teare J`s decision on the importance of a dispute settlement clause. However, in both cases, the parties agreed to conclude a separate agreement setting out, inter alia, the rules for the constitution of the tribunal and the procedure. You have never entered into these separate agreements. Both jurisdictions have upheld the arbitration clauses, as these clauses allow a clear infer infer of the parties` intention to be subject to arbitration. In addition, the courts have decided that the composition of the tribunal or the rules of procedure are not mandatory requirements of an arbitration clause. If the parties do not agree on these requirements, the rules of delay in German arbitration law apply, such as.B.